The copies are basically new items, with new IDs but with identical content. These items are completely separate from the original items, meaning that any changes in the original items will not be carried out in the new items. On the other hand, a reference is simply a link to the original exercise. Meaning that the original exercise is still located in the original subject, but is linked to the new subject.
This entails that any alterations in the original item will be visible in the referenced exercise in the new subject, too. You do not have edit rights to the exercise itself, but you can edit the set of exercises; you can add, remove, and replace exercises in your new subject. Let's go back to the subject "Variables" in the screenshot. Instead, if you find a reference image like a picture that you took or a screenshot of a 3D model , you are completely at liberty to trace it.
My 2D art teacher made us go outside into the city to take pictures of buildings that we later traced to create a finished drawing. I created my own 3D model and painted over it to create the interior scene of a potions lab.
This is so I can make scenes with perfect perspective without the hassle of running around with a ruler and painstakingly measuring everything. Of course, if you want to do things quickly off the top of your head, your best bet is to learn anatomy really well.
The grey area happens here though: what if an artist draws a reference that you want to use? For example, kibbitzer does some amazing pose studies that I often use as references. In my opinion, you should be allowed to reference that pose, but not trace it. TLDR: Tracing is good. You can and should trace references to learn how to draw things.
If an artist draws a reference, use it as a reference, not as a base to trace over, unless the specific purpose of the image is to be used as a base. Tracing is a good way to learn.
Length]; out of the CopyValue method same for the other case and instead supply an already newed up array to the method. The way your test works now, the time of the array constructors are part of your total time.
Not sure if it will make much difference but might be worth testing. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. That's correct - you made a copy of reference. Now, what about why your implementation of CopyReference is slower. You have to do performance analysis to get real insight about it, but on top of my head: You're creating a new instance of DoubleWrapper reference type , inside that method. Improve this answer. Tigran Tigran 60k 8 8 gold badges 81 81 silver badges bronze badges.
MPoutanen MPoutanen 2 2 silver badges 7 7 bronze badges. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password.
Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog. Podcast Explaining the semiconductor shortage, and how it might end. Both of the sites mentioned above were required to take their sites down or pay monetary penalties. In one sense these two companies were lucky that they were able to avoid costly legal ramifications, but on the other hand they were hemorrhaging money every day their sites were down.
Perhaps, to save money by not hiring a professional copy writer to create their own original content. Perhaps, to cut down on design costs by providing an existing direction to knock off.
I could be wrong, but I often find these types of decisions are in some way tied to money. Now these companies are both faced with getting their websites back online as quickly as possible. This will require a completely new site design with clean code, purchased images, copy writing, and probably some type of rush charge all on top of the original website build cost. If you find instances of this using Copyscape, then you can try to contact the webmasters to have them remove the content from their site.
My experience with this has not been to successful; a more effective alternative is to request a duplicate content removal from Google.
0コメント